Evolving Thoughts

Trashcan: hobs and goblins

I’ve been travelling a little to organise my move to Sydney. Love the building, the department, the people and the project. Not sure about Sydney… so anyway, nothing of substance from me for a while.

Here’s a lovely little essay about Newton pissing off most of the European intellectual giants of his time, by one of our commentators, Thony Christie, at Etherwave Propaganda. He truly was the most egotistical and curmudgeonly bastard of his time, matched only by his actual achievements.

The latest Linnaeus’ Legacy is up at Agricultural Biodiversity. They had the good taste to use one of mine.

Bob Grumbine, a net friend for many years, is trying a science blog aimed at secondary school students. Keep an eye on it. His daughter has one that covers, among other things, women in science.

John Hawks discusses what you get if you buy a species name: fame or a defeasible hypothesis?

Ecology and Biodiversity General Science Humor Species and systematics trashcan categorial

Related Posts

Evolution

Liveblogging the conference: Piotrowski

Monica Piotrowski (Utah) also is talking about DNA Barcoding. She starts with a child’s coin sorter. Imagine that it’s a bug-sorter, sorting by DNA samples. What does the child now have? She claims Barcoders must have a species concept to measure the success of their practice. They have none, and…

Read More
General Science

Etruscans

In a well known quote, the nineteenth century historian and classicist Theodore Mommsen said that the origins of the Etruscans was “neither capable of being known nor worth the knowing”. He had no idea of the results made possible by molecular genetic studies, naturally, as nobody did at that time,…

Read More

Comments (12)

  2. Hooray! Sydney finally gets our own SciBlogger. Shame you’re signing up with that *other* uni though. Post an entry when you get settled in and maybe us Sydneysiders can prove to you that we’re not as bad as our reputation.

  3. Hooray! Sydney finally gets our own SciBlogger. Shame you’re signing up with that *other* uni though. Post an entry when you get settled in and maybe us Sydneysiders can prove to you that we’re not as bad as our reputation.

  5. The name is forever, yes. But what you pay for is to have your name attached uniquely to the species, and if yours turns out to be the junior synonym, shouldn’t you get a refund? Or is good faith involved in thinking the species diagnosis was correct? Or maybe researchers will use fake hypotheses of uniqueness to defraud corporate customers? I can see a whole can of worms here, and I’m not even properly awake…

  6. The name is forever, yes. But what you pay for is to have your name attached uniquely to the species, and if yours turns out to be the junior synonym, shouldn’t you get a refund? Or is good faith involved in thinking the species diagnosis was correct? Or maybe researchers will use fake hypotheses of uniqueness to defraud corporate customers? I can see a whole can of worms here, and I’m not even properly awake…

  9. John Hawks is wrong in his discussion of species names. All species names are, in fact, eternal. If a species name is thought incorrect, that name goes into the synonomy of the name which replaces it. The name in synonomy is eternal, though not so glorious. Perhaps synonomy should trigger a partial refund.

  10. John Hawks is wrong in his discussion of species names. All species names are, in fact, eternal. If a species name is thought incorrect, that name goes into the synonomy of the name which replaces it. The name in synonomy is eternal, though not so glorious. Perhaps synonomy should trigger a partial refund.

  11. Welcome to the City of the Bridge, John!
    Let us all know when you’re feeling thirsty; we’ll fix that problem.

  12. Welcome to the City of the Bridge, John!
    Let us all know when you’re feeling thirsty; we’ll fix that problem.

Comments are closed.