David Armstrong dies 17 May 201417 May 2014 I received this message via the Australasian Association of Philosophy: The philosophical community will be saddened to learn that David Malet Armstrong died on the 13th of May after a long illness: two months shy of his 88th birthday. DMA or Armo, as he was affectionately known, is the most important philosopher that Australia has produced. Such has been his impact that he not only made major contributions to the philosophy of mind, epistemology and metaphysics, he also played a significant role in laying out the terrain and setting the agenda in those fields. As one reviewer put it when summing up Armstrong’s book What is a Law of Nature?, ‘all future work … starts here’. The Australasian Association of Philosophy expresses its sadness at David Armstrong’s death, and offers its condolences to his wife Jenny and her children and his sister Suzanne. The AAP, has placed a section on its website: http://www.aap.org.au/blog?mode=PostView&bmi=1553520, where people are welcome to visit and add their recollections of David. Please let people know about the page. I did not know him well, but I did meet him a few times… Australian stuff Logic and philosophy Metaphysics Philosophy
Philosophy My Absent Career 13: Critical mass 17 Jan 202318 Jan 2023 Having taught critical reasoning and studied the usual logic for philosophy undergrads, I felt that I had a pretty good understanding of logic and reasoning, at least without getting into modal logics and other such aberrations. Not for the first or last time I mistook confidence for competence. Neil Thomason,… Read More
Biology Social dominance psychology in humans 2 Jul 200922 Jun 2018 There is a syllogism I call the Phylogenetic Inference: All members of clade X are F Species S is a member of clade X S is F It’s not infallible, but it is a good inductive rule, because monophyly acts as a kind of Straight Rule for biological induction. Let’s… Read More
Cognition Are emotions 2D? 7 Oct 20137 Oct 2013 I recently became aware that there is a new development in emotion classification. Previously, as far as I knew, emotions were thought to be human universals, give or take some variation (such as the emotion “metagu” among the Ifaluk islanders, see Linquist 2007) and researchers like Paul Ekman, who works as… Read More
I thought John Mackie was the most important philosopher Australia has produced. (Perhaps that’s because of my Gnu Atheist roots and Mackie’s ‘Miracle of Theism’?). Excepting our venerable host. But have never heard of this man who encapsulated all that was a major sporting team in London named after an armory.
Armstong is a candidate. But one of many, including several working philosophers. Chalmers actually is a much stronger candidate.
It’s such a pity that Dave is best known for his antithesis of materialism, while Armstrong was known for materialism, when Dave is such a nice guy, and Armstrong was not very nice to up and coming philosophers.
I have to disagree. He was always pleasant and friendly to me when I was young and indeed thereafter. And it certainly wasn’t because I agreed with his politics, which I did not.