What I have been doing lately, and why 30 May 2009 It seems like only yesterday that we moved to these new digs, when in actual fact it’s a few days before yesterday. But I have been busy in real life, which is an uncommon occurence (having a real life, I mean), so I have not blogged as well or deeply as I might.Of course, being terminably lazy and an exponent of Procrastination Fu (third dan), I might not have blogged as well or as deeply as I might anyway. The world is full of possibilities, and the possible worlds are full of many outcomes. Speaking of possible worlds, I have just returned from Brisbane, where among other fun things I delivered a half of a talk (the other half being done by Phil Dowe) in which we argued that even a constrained deity might have chosen a world that satisfies some arbitrary set of utility functions by simulating the worlds and making real (I believe the phrase I used was “pour metaphysical plaster into the logical mold”) the best of the ones simulated, so a proper (“Leibnizian”) deity could have chosen to make this world such that (i) everything that happens in it happens according to natural laws (or, as theologians call them, “secondary powers”), including Darwinian evolution, and (ii) still be responsible for the outcome of a Providential Plan (“primary powers”). Whether that god could have made me use better sentence construction just now is imponderable. But this implies 1. That a theist can happily be an evolutionist without the need for God to be a micromanager in their belief set (but that they still have a problem of evil), and 2. Darwin was wrong. Last week, I was in Canberra (oy! what a motorcycle ride that was!) giving again my half of a talk (which was a whole talk, but delivered while madman of my acquaintance, Jason Grossman gave his talk, and several of his students did things like strum ukeleles, iron, and play a snare drum) on “how not to Feyerabend“. I really should have updated it to remove references to the Howard government of late unlamented memory. So I’m back and reading things upon which I may asseverate. Or not. Administrative Creationism and Intelligent Design Epistemology Evolution Humor Metaphysics Philosophy Science
Epistemology Pattern cladism and the myth of theory dependence of observation 4 Mar 2011 A new paper has been published in the History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, entitled “Pattern Cladism, Homology, and Theory-Neutrality” by Christopher Pearson. Either the journal has done something horrible to the text, or the author doesn’t know the difference between Willi Hennig and William Hennig, or between Gareth… Read More
History It’s official – Wittgenstein wins in a landslide 11 Mar 2009 Leiter’s poll has Wittgenstein beating Frege. I’m disappointed that Peirce didn’t get a higher ranking, and astonished the Nietzsche did. Read More
Administrative Icons for peer-reviewed blogging 29 Oct 200718 Sep 2017 The above are icons to be used when blogging on actual peer-reviewed research (as opposed to popular reports or kookery). I had a marginal involvement in this (I made some passing comments early on) so it is with great pride… no, actually, it’s all down to Dave Munger, who was… Read More
I keep planning to give lessons, but something always comes up. When I get to fifth dan, I will probably stop planning…