Social networking is not new 26 May 2009 John Hawks mentioned a lovely article in the New York Times, interviewing an anthropologist, Pauline Wiessner, who worked with the !Kung bushmen in the Kalahari. She notes that they maintain social relationships across many hundreds (and in her case, when they found a satellite phone, thousands!) of kilometres. This means that through the use of small gifts and messages, they have people who can help them with resources when they are in need. Q. Were there any special messages in the gifts? A. That the relationship was alive and well, and to remind the exchange partner that they had a kind of contract to call on each other in times of need. Actually, in the Kalahari, people send gifts to their exchange partners even when there isn’t a crisis. Like Christmas cards and presents, these objects are information on the status of the relationship. We may not particularly want Aunt Sally’s holiday fruit cake, but we’d be troubled if it didn’t arrive every year. In the Kalahari, if gifts aren’t sent, it means the relationship is in poor repair. People know their networks are crucial to how they get past the hard times, and they tend them with loving care. She goes on to make a very significant point about human prehistory: I think they are a clue to how modern humans moved out of Africa around 45,000 years ago. Unless these migrants had support systems in a founding group and could maintain ties with them, it probably wouldn’t have been possible to keep pushing into unknown territory. It only took modern humans some 5,000 years to move out of Africa, cross Eurasia and end up in Australia. I think that the invention of social networks — the storing of relationships for a time when you will need them — is what facilitated this expansion. When Claudia Dreifus, the journalist, asked her for a modern example, of course it was Facebook. People who use it say it keeps memories of distant friends alive and it sometimes brings long-lost relationships back home. We all know of people who’ve been “friended” by old pals from college and former neighbors they’ve lost touch with. When they see pictures of them and read “sharings” from their Facebook partners, they are reminded of their presence in their lives. This set me going about my childhood friends, and so I set off looking for my oldest friend, who I haven’t seen in 21 years (he moved to Darwin, and I just moved). He didn’t have a FB page, but he was mentioned online, and I have wikkid Google fu! So we spent a nice time on the phone (oldtech, sure, but hey…) catching up and exchanging news. I first met him when I went to kindergarten. Only one other person alive has known me longer. If ever there’s a major drought here, I hope I can go live with him until it recedes… Evolution Social evolution
Politics Now for the downside of the elections 5 Nov 200818 Sep 2017 The antigay marriage measures in Arizona and Florida passed, and it looks like the Californian one will also pass. I cannot see how anyone can justify refusing a large minority the rights afforded the majority. There’s a name for that. I reiterate my modest proposal. Read More
Biology The difference between population concepts and “population thinking” 8 Jan 201224 Nov 2022 The late Ernst Mayr is remembered for many things, but a number of his historical and philosophical claims are unravelling. The very clever and perspicacious Rutgers geneticist, Jody Hey, has published a paper in the Quarterly Review of Biology on one of these. Jody is a very good reader of… Read More
Evolution New Companion to Philosophy of History 20 Feb 2008 From The Blackwell Companions to Philosophy series comes A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography edited by Aviezer Tucker. It looks fascinating, especially essay 36 on Darwin… Read More
Here’s a digression that might be tangentially relevant (as in definitely tangential; might be relevant). Once, back when I was living in the residential wing of a theological college, I overheard a lecture in which students being instructed on how to become a Christian missionary. The lecturer told the students that what you do is, you find someone who has recently had a dream about a messenger from far away who would deliver an important message, and you declare yourself to be the messenger from that dream. Honestly, that is what they teach people. It was also strongly implied that you can always find someone who has had such a dream and that this is evidence for the truth of Christianity – your arrival was prophecised. My thoughts: (1) In a society where people send messengers on long treks to tell each other about the location of dead elephants and so on, it isn’t very surprising if dreams about long-distance messengers are common. (2) If you want to count dreams as evidence for your own religion, you should be consistent and count them as evidence for other religions, too (e.g. the appointment of the Dalai Lama is alleged to be based on dreams).