Phobosophy 14 Aug 201714 Aug 2017 As everyone knows, philosophy comes from the two Greek words philo and sophos, and means, roughly, the love of wisdom, although as everyone also knows, Socrates declared his wisdom was his knowledge that he knew nothing. In recent years (by which I mean increasingly since the 1970s), there has been a drop away from knowledge and understanding as virtues, in favour of an adherence to “identity” beliefs, in which the facts and values that are treasured are those that either support one’s favoured view of the world, or are made up to support it. In short, there is now a fear of wisdom. This has been called many things: willful ignorance, willful blindness, tactical stupidity, or (and this is new to me) “Nelsonian knowledge”, from Admiral Horatio Nelson’s famous act of putting a telescope to his blind eye. But it is more than something risible, or derisible. It is a major issue in modern society, and it is causing problems of a high order. It needs a name. So, I am proposing “phobosophy” – the fear of wisdom. We seem phobosophy in conspiracy theories, the denial of scientific knowledge, in the “news bubbles” that conservatives and the hard left keep themselves insulated in. We see it in journalists who give equal time to the moronic as the experts. We see it in politicians who repeat the same old failed policies because they think that to do otherwise breaks some basic principle (like the addicted and the poor are morally responsible for their plight). And so on. As fascism rises again, aided by the vested interests of the power class and the oligarchy; as religious interests demonise women and the heterotransgressives; as entire ethnic and religious groups are treated as subhuman in the media and in internment camps (but not our ethnic and religious groups!), there is a burning need to call things what they are. So I offer this as a way to name the overall failure of rational, evidence based, and just thinking. Freedom Journalism Philosophy Politics Pop culture Rant Religion Sermon
History Responsibility 23 Dec 201122 Jun 2018 Click to go to the original and make rude comments about the misuse of “begs the question”. Late note: The bastard fixed it. Find something else to complain about… Read More
Administrative Vale Chesh 30 Jan 200818 Sep 2017 For a long time, I thought that animals were pretty much as Descartes thought – largely unreasoning organic machines. This morning, my teacher on animal communications died. Her name was Chesh, and she was 17 and a half. She was a year younger than my eldest, and a year older… Read More
Creationism and Intelligent Design Closet Darwinism, and definitions 12 Apr 201412 Apr 2014 Every so often, somebody makes the case that “Darwinism”, “Darwinist” and “Darwinian”, being the generic noun, the individual term, and the adjective of Darwin’s name and therefore (supposedly) theory, are dead terms that cause nothing but harm (see Scott and Branch 2009). Larry Moran has just made this very argument,… Read More
Phobosophy often turns into echthosophy or so it seems. I saw a poll, for what it is worth, that 24% of Trump supporters could not imagine anything that Trump could do to lose their support. On the other hand, I see Liberty University alumni are threatening to return their diplomas, again for what they are worth, over Jerry Falwell’s comments on Charlottesville. Hope?