New paper on polyploid speciation 27 Aug 2009 For a long time now, people have known of speciation by the multiplication of chromosomes (polyploidy), either of one’s own chromosomes (autopolyploidy) or by doubling a mismatched set from some other species’ chromosomes (allopolyploidy) to even up the numbers and gene complements. Some have thought this to be an uninteresting and rare form of speciation (e.g., Mayr in 1942), and others that it is the main form of speciation (e.g., M. J. D. White in the 1960s and 70s). Now a paper has come out that suggests that the rate of polyploidy is between 15% and 30% in plants. Neither the primary mode, nor the uninteresting aberrations of Mayr. The EBB and Flow has a review of this paper here. How does this translate to other organisms like animals? It is going to depend on two factors, one generic and one specific. The generic is whether or not the species is a gamete broadcaster – whether it simply disperses spores into a medium like water or air. A coral specialist once told me that what maintains coral species, for example, is the prevailing currents; as they change, so too do the fertilisation events. The specific is whether or not the meiosis process (i.e., the halving of the chromosome count in gamete formation) is easily disrupted in that species, or whether chromosomes can easily be doubled and then not reduced in the zygote. In other words, we don’t know for sure. But I will bet that it is less than 30% for animals, but more than 0%. Ecology and Biodiversity Evolution Genetics Species and systematics Species concept
Evolution Religion and Tolerance 21 Jul 2010 The video from the Religion and Toleration conference I attended is now online (details below the fold). Read More
Evolution Popper peeps papally at UD 15 Aug 2007 Popper’s view of science has been supplanted by a number of later views, not least being the sociological accounts of Kuhn and Lakatos, which, being sociological, don’t tell us what is science but only how it proceeds descriptively. Prescriptive views of science are much more nuanced than Popper these days, and they lack a simple slogan like the cry of “falsifiability!” They typically focus on the heuristics (rules of inference) and how they have developed overall and in particular disciplines. If you want to argue that ID is science, go read van Fraassen, or Hacking, or Giere, or Laudan and get back to me. Read More
Evolution A quote: On philosophers and evolution 23 Mar 2010 Another curious aspect of the theory of evolution is that everybody thinks he understands it. I mean philosophers, social scientists, and so on. While in fact very few people understand it, actually, as it stands, even as it stood when Darwin expressed it, and even less as we now may… Read More
The interesting point here is that allopolyploidal events produce speciation in two generations, something to stump your average creationist.