Lucretius and the papal secretary 25 Feb 201927 Feb 2019 Poggio (also known as Poggio Bracciolini) [Wikipedia] In 1417, during the Council of Constance that reunited the Catholic Church in the west, a papal secretary took advantage of the location in Germany to visit some libraries, while the papacy was vacant. He was hunting manuscripts, but not the newly written ones. Instead Gian Francesco Poggio was seeking ancient manuscripts. A humanist inspired by Petrarch, Poggio sought classical Latin scripts. Among many others, he found one in particular; a ninth century Carolingian copy of De Rerum Natura (On the nature of things) by Titus Lucretius Carus, the only widely known copy at the time. Lucretius [Wikipedia] Lucretius’ long six-volume poem was at once heretical and revolutionary. Poggio knew of Epicurus, the Greek philosopher Lucretius followed, but little was known about his work directly. Instead, he was ridiculed and dismissed as a glutton and atheist by his enemies. Indeed, Epicurus’ name even became the Hebrew word for atheist. Poggio sent this manuscript to a friend who copied it and circulated it, though he lost Poggio’s discovered copy. The beginning of a 1563 manuscript of Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura, currently in the collection of the Cambridge University Library [Wikimedia] Lucretius’ poem discussed the nature of the physical world, and this included atomism (the idea that everything is made up of very small objects ), the creative role of chance events, leading deterministically to humans and animals and plants, and the complete lack of interest by the gods in anything that might happen in the physical world (hence the charge of atheism; Epicurean philosophy did not worship or seek to influence the gods). Although clearly dangerous, a code of disavowal in forewords and use of Lucretius developed so that he could be emulated, inspire paintings, and philosophised about without finding oneself tied to a pyre. His ideas then influenced many early modern thinkers and naturalists as modern science started up. Moreover, his distant gods allowed a space for deism and other unorthodox ideas to take root in the west. One might say that without Lucretius’ influence, neither the Enlightenment, nor modern science, would have been possible at the times they happened. It turns out that other libraries had copies of De Rerum Natura, and the ideas he espoused had not exactly been forgotten, but they had been suppressed. The flourishing of his sceptical philosophy led more or less directly to modern scepticism, the possibility of public atheism, and mechanical science. In some ways he is the forerunner to modernism. Had the Catholic Church not been riven by schism at the time, and seeking to reconcile its communion, we might not have the world of science, scepticism and irreligion of today. References Alison Brown. “Lucretius and the Epicureans in the Social and Political Context of Renaissance Florence.” I Tatti Studies in the Italian Renaissance 9 (2001): 11. https://doi.org/10/dvt84c. Lucretius. On the Nature of Things (De Rerum Natura). London: Sphere Books, 1969. Prosperi, Valentina. “Lucretius in the Italian Renaissance.” In The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius, edited by Philip Hardie and Stuart Gillespie, 214–26. Cambridge Companions to Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521848015.014. External resources Lucretius in Latin. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Lucretius. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Lucretius. A review of Stephen Greenblatt’s The Swerve in the Guardian. A review of The Swerve in Harvard’s magazine. General Science History Philosophy
Epistemology Tautology 7: Conclusions 6 Sep 2009 So to finish, I will repeat the conclusion, and then make some comments on Fodor’s attack on “Darwinism”. Here is the complete series: The tautology problem Tautology 1a: corrections Tautology 1b: Butler Tautology 2: The problem arises Tautology 3: The problem spreads Tautology 4: What is a tautology? Tautology 5a:… Read More
Chocosophy Zombies and chocolate: what it is like to eat a block 17 Jul 20126 Feb 2013 Zombies are very much in the news lately. People are using them as a way to teach science. However, long before the scientists caught up with the trends, philosophy had been discussing zombies after the question of whether there are philosophical zombies (P-zombies) was raised by Saul Kripke in 1972,… Read More
General Science Is there a physicist in the house? 10 Jan 2008 One of my colleagues just raised a point I hadn’t thought of vis á vis Special Relativity. I had always thought that an observer on a photon would not experience time. My colleague suggests that each frame of reference – the fast moving and the “stationary” – would experience time… Read More