It's a mystery 28 May 2010 Since the earliest times in recorded Graecoroman history, there have been mystery cults. Every cultic practice for a god had secret rituals and spaces, and there were a number of mystery religions, known as the Eleusinian mysteries, that developed that we know little about. In an excellent review of a new book by Hugh Bowden, it is suggested that actually there were no secret doctrines, just rituals and objects. These mystery religions developed later into the Gnostic traditions (a Gnostic is “one who knows”, gnosis), eventually ending up as Rosicrucian, Masonic, and various other modern mystery religions and cults. It has been said to me by a friend that he thinks that the Phaedo is a presentation of the esoteric (inner circle) teachings in exoteric (outer circle) form of Pythagorean cultic teachings. It may be this is true, but given Bowden’s thesis, I wonder if it is supportable. Clearly the Pythagoreans had doctrines, as well as rituals and sacred objects, and even more clearly they had extensive esoteric mathematical doctrines. It would be good to see how he treats them. Coincidentally, Scientific American has a piece in which Michelangelo and da Vinci are supposed to have encoded secret teaching about the brain in the Sistine Chapel, which I wonder might be a case of pareidolia on the part of two neurobiologists. History Religion History
Rant My feet, my neck, my head 20 Aug 201120 Aug 2011 No, this isn’t a list of my better features or my autapomorphies. It is a list of the things that really, really, hurt. For those who do not know, I am without employment, and so I have taken up a factory job that involves me walking for eight hours a… Read More
Biology Species-related publications 8 Sep 20238 Sep 2023 What’s a personal blog for, if not to blow my own horn? Well, it can only be to blow the horns of those who I have collaborated with, of course. Two of my most recent publications are: The first is a chapter in the open Access book edited by Schwartz… Read More
Religion Thomism and Intelligent Design 16 Feb 2009 I have always had a sneaking admiration for neo-Thomistic accounts of creation and evolution, because they tend to think of creation as the actualisation of the real world with no limitations on natural law within the created universe. Now read this nice piece by Michael Tkacz. You need not agree… Read More
Looks like a trilobite to me. I’m sure, because I carefully compared it to all known images of trilobites.