It’s a mystery 28 May 2010 Since the earliest times in recorded Graecoroman history, there have been mystery cults. Every cultic practice for a god had secret rituals and spaces, and there were a number of mystery religions, known as the Eleusinian mysteries, that developed that we know little about. In an excellent review of a new book by Hugh Bowden, it is suggested that actually there were no secret doctrines, just rituals and objects. These mystery religions developed later into the Gnostic traditions (a Gnostic is “one who knows”, gnosis), eventually ending up as Rosicrucian, Masonic, and various other modern mystery religions and cults. It has been said to me by a friend that he thinks that the Phaedo is a presentation of the esoteric (inner circle) teachings in exoteric (outer circle) form of Pythagorean cultic teachings. It may be this is true, but given Bowden’s thesis, I wonder if it is supportable. Clearly the Pythagoreans had doctrines, as well as rituals and sacred objects, and even more clearly they had extensive esoteric mathematical doctrines. It would be good to see how he treats them. Coincidentally, Scientific American has a piece in which Michelangelo and da Vinci are supposed to have encoded secret teaching about the brain in the Sistine Chapel, which I wonder might be a case of pareidolia on the part of two neurobiologists. History Religion History
Creationism and Intelligent Design Consequences of theistic evolution 3 Jul 201022 Jun 2018 So in parts one and two I proposed a problem and solution to the reconciliation of a limited theism with science, and in particular evolution. The aim was to preserve a complete scientific explanation, with no constraints or hedging or intervention, and to see if it could be made consistent… Read More
Book That’s not an Origin of Species; *this* is an Origin of Species 24 Sep 2009 I would strongly suggest that if you find Kirk Cameron’s “edition” of the Origin of Species that you quietly dispose of it in an environmentally conscious manner. However, if you want a good edition, I recommend this one by Jim Endersby, a well known historian of the nineteenth century, from… Read More
Epistemology Fishing for philosophy 11 May 2010 Okay, so my last response on Jesus as a philosopher didn’t satisfy Chris Schoen, but then nobody, least of all me or him, thought that I was going to be able to. But I find some interesting misunderstandings. Since the onus for communication lies with the communicator, this is clearly… Read More
Looks like a trilobite to me. I’m sure, because I carefully compared it to all known images of trilobites.