How not to give a keynote 6 Jul 201222 Jun 2018 So we finally managed to get things going for the Poland keynote. It took over half an hour to get the sound working, after a fashion, and the connection was blocky at best. The hardest part was that I kept trying to hear what people were saying at the other end, but got only feedback and delayed echoes. Most disconcerting. It would have been almost easier to fly to Poland. Here’s the slides if anyone is interested: Cognition Epistemology Evolution Natural Classification Philosophy Religion Social dominance Social evolution Systematics
Epistemology Peirce on Darwin (1877) 18 Aug 2009 The Darwinian controversy is, in large part, a question of logic. Mr. Darwin proposed to apply the statistical method to biology. The same thing had been done in a widely different branch of science, the theory of gases. Though unable to say what the movements of any particular molecule of… Read More
Freedom The Abstract and the Concrete, or, the Road to Fascism 9 Apr 20179 Apr 2017 I was thinking about the way in which the anti-abortionists justify their views. I have always said that “Pro-Life” is a misnomer. Instead of being pro-life, they are pro-potential life. In order to protect potential lives, they ignore the needs and rights of those who have actual life – the women who cannot… Read More
History Abandon all hope, ye who enter here! 23 Apr 2008 Or, “Ive been a baaaddd boy, Abbott” The Dante’s Inferno Test has banished you to the Second Level of Hell!Here is how you matched up against all the levels: Level Score Purgatory (Repenting Believers) Very Low Level 1 – Limbo (Virtuous Non-Believers) Moderate Level 2 (Lustful) Very High Level 3… Read More
I did enjoy your slides and I have downloaded the pdf to go through them ‘in big’. I thought your hypothesis was worthy of consideration, and seems to capture some of the aspects of formal religion. My own thoughts are that there may be a wider hypothesis, in two parts. The second part is your hypothesis. My first part is that the ‘evolutionary modules’ set up our young for the second part to get a grip on the mind. The sort of evolutionary modules I have in mind are the HADD you mention, together with the tendency of the very young to ‘over imitate’ (as mentioned in your ‘New Thinking’ blog). Imagine you are a babe or toddler that is regularly taken to church and fed the line that ‘God’ explains this or that. You are innately keen to detect agency as an explanation for events in your world, and you are innately keen to overimitate your parents’ rituals (such as praying) in their social lives. Unlike Santa Claus there is no way of ‘unlearning’ the unnecessary bits of overimitation, and no way of understanding the mysterious hidden agencies in your world. You are prepared for the cultural aspects of the hypothesis (social dominance etc.) to take hold as you mature and social position becomes culturally important. But your culture is underpinned by your earlier experiences as a child. Evolution and culture combined. Poor suckers never had a chance.
But in fact children do not automagically think that agency is required to explain things (and I reckon that a great many early agrarian societies did not think that either); they have to be enculturated into it. Kelemen, D. 2004. Are Children “Intuitive Theists”?: Reasoning About Purpose and Design in Nature. Psychological Science 15:295-301.
There is a third approach. Evolutionary psychology and sociobiology, to some extent, focus on stereotypic (fixed) human characteristics, while the study of individual differences attempts to infer the nature of genetic and cultural causative factors of within-population variation. One recent example of that line of analysis is Button et al (2011). If one can demonstrate genetic or environmental correlations with particular personality traits, these might point to targets for selcction. A non-homology with other primates that might predispose to a belief in a divine parent, that I first encountered reading Arthur C. Clarke, is a prolonged childhood. And I can’t help mentioning re euhemerisation (well not quite), the Prince Philip Movement, a phenomenon I wasn’t aware of before last night…
There are numerous cases of recent euhemerization. My favourite case is Maria Lionza in Peru. The divine parent thing strikes me as unexplanatory and ad hoc. It doesn’t in the slightest follow that because we are (if we are) neotenous that our deities will be more parental than, say, a gorilla’s, were said gorilla given speech and agriculture. In fact given the absolute physical power of a silverback, I would expect their deities to be more parental. And let us hope God is not a chimp male parent! However, in every ape, parents are higher status across cohort ranges, so it is to be expected that if deities are high status, at least some of them will be parents.
Well, despite all of the difficulties, all of us in Kazimierz were very impressed and interested in what you had to say. In fact, it is quite astounding how you managed under the circumstances. The difficulties helped to focus everyone’s mind on the content of your talk. I suggest that from now on you give all your talks in this intercontinental fashion. Thanks for doing it.
Thanks Konrad, but while I greatly appreciate the honour of giving the talk, next time I will do something easier, like removing my head, placing it in a fluid jar, and mailing that to the conference. In the short and longer term, it will be less painful. Or I could just record it and make the recording available online. Whatever…
Earlier this year on this blog, I announced my write-in campaign for the Presidency of the United States of America. I finally decided on my platform. I promise monthly chocolate vouchers for every citizen.
I meant for this to go to “Chocolatarianism: the only rational foundation for ethics,” but the above is an example of how not announce a politcal platform.