Do low status primates eat badly? 9 Jun 2008 A blog that I have just come across is Deric Bownds’ Mindblog. He covers issues of standard and evolutionary psychology and is well worth reading. One of his posts is this: Social heirarchy, stress, and diet, in which he presents recent evidence that stressed primates (in this case humans) eat lower quality, high sugar and high starch, food (crisps and M&Ms). Why? I can think of several reasons. One is that this gives immediate energy release to deal with the stressors. But what if you are constantly stressed, by, say, being of low status on the social dominance hierarchy? Then you might eat low quality food too much of the time, and your health would suffer. This may explain the famous Whitehall Study and subsequent experiments, that show that, controlling for all other factors, low status is a predictor of worse health. This is not restricted to human primates, either – Macaques and other monkeys, baboons and the great apes all show this effect. Evolution Species and systematics
Evolution The trashcan categorial 20 Nov 2008 I’m introducing a new category – the Trashcan. This is a term used in systematics to identify a group that comprises “everything else” once you have done the identification of the real groups of some taxonomic grouping. I will be using the Trashcan to group together all and only those… Read More
Biology A nineteenth century view on classification 18 Oct 201420 Oct 2014 The principle upon which I understand the Natural System of Botany to be founded is, that the affinities of plants may be determined by a consideration of all the points of resemblance between their various parts, properties, and qualities; that thence an arrangement may be deduced in which those species… Read More
Biology Ranking 24 Aug 2010 A diversion in the natural classification series. In natural classification, we typically do not find that patterns due to the process of historical causation come arrayed neatly in boxes within boxes, and yet one of the most common temptations is for classifiers to set up fixed ranks. The Linnaean scheme… Read More
I actually know Dr. Bownds from the first few of what I hope to be many meetings with him for advice and guidance on my path to my PhD (I go to the University of Wisconsin – Madison; I’m an undergraduate and a neuroscience student, and may or may not go to grad school in my field at UW-Madison as well – I plan to get my PhD in neuroscience), and he’s got a whole wealth of posts on this, as well as a fairly massive repository of knowledge on biology of mind – he was the first chairman of my university’s neuroscience department, which I am an undergraduate member of, and wrote possibly the most well-known textbook on biology of mind and our university’s biology of mind course. And he’s a pretty darn good mentor and role model of sorts too, despite the fact that he’s a professor emeritus so I’m shit out of luck if I want to do any research with him. Consciousness and neuroethology is his thing. I’d check out the textbook for his course and his work in visual neuroscience – it’s good stuff.