Why wasn’t I told? 25 Jan 2008 A passing reference to Language Log has introduced me to an excellent blog. For instance, this well-balanced post on hate speech. Why didn’t someone notify me of it before? Administrative
Administrative On blogging while tenure tracking 20 Jul 2008 John Hawks has an excellent essay up (I don’t know how correct it is, never having been on a tenure track) on the merits and problems of being an academic blogger. Do read it. Read More
Administrative Wilkins in Spanish (or Portuguese) 3 Aug 2008 It is an odd thing seeing one’s words in another language. Joao Carlos at Chí Vó, Non Pó has translated my TREE article into Portuguese (I think). Without my permission, though, and probably not the editor’s. Joao, you’d better contact the journal and get permission. Springer can be brutal about… Read More
Administrative Second book cover 9 Jul 200922 Jun 2018 From Peter Lang publishers, due this year (soon, I hope!). Order yours now! Read More
Language log is a great blog, but that’s not one of their better posts (anything by Mark Lieberman is great, though Pullum is usually excellent too). The only problem here is the excessive zeal and officiousness of the British police. Two local (to me) examples: Oxfordshire police charged a student with hate speech after he said to a policeman “do you realize your horse is gay?” And more recently, when someone threw a water bottle to a protestor sitting in a tree, the police charged him with littering. In both cases the courts threw out the cases and money was wasted.
That’s what happens when you’ve hired too many police in the name of political expediency, and now they’re looking for something to do to justify their existence. Apparently it happens on the left as well as the right (for the right, “security” is the buzzword, rather than hate-speech.)
I suppose that I simply assumed that, as one of the cool intellectual bloggers, you already knew about Language Log. In any event, glad you found it.
Jeff, note in the 2 examples I gave if there was an agenda it was certainly not left-wing. In both cases (including the one using hate speech legislation) the target were environmental protestors. I suspect it is the police using a handy tool to do their master’s bidding, not their promotion of a left-wing agenda.
Jeff, note in the 2 examples I gave if there was an agenda it was certainly not left-wing. In both cases (including the one using hate speech legislation) the target were environmental protestors. I suspect it is the police using a handy tool to do their master’s bidding, not their promotion of a left-wing agenda.
Neil, it’s the not the target but the source that I was considering. Maybe I’m wrong, but I see the British government as being somewhat to the left of the USA’s. I also don’t see them as actively promoting a left wing agenda. I wouldn’t be surprised if many of them need to look like they’re doing something. I may be wrong in associating “security” with the right, though. I’ve heard the security in Britain is very tight – tracking everyone and their cars wherever they go, etc.
Jeff, *all* Western governments, probably all other properly elected governments, are to the left of the US govt. In any case, the decision to prosecute is not up to the govt: it is a police and DPP matter. Neither are conceivably left-wing.