Why wasn’t I told? 25 Jan 2008 A passing reference to Language Log has introduced me to an excellent blog. For instance, this well-balanced post on hate speech. Why didn’t someone notify me of it before? Administrative
Administrative Get your Evolution Carnival posts in soon! 23 Apr 201223 Apr 2012 There’s only a week left to submit to the next Carnival of Evolution hosted here! Hop to it folks, or I’ll have to link to my own posts, and nobody wants that. Read More
Administrative Australian Easter bits 9 Apr 2009 A young gorilla escaped from his enclosure at the Melbourne Zoo last night and wandered about for 20 minutes while craven visitors hid out. I would have sat and waited for him to introduce himself. And paid good money for the chance. A moron by the name of Cardinal George… Read More
Administrative Online, about being online 12 Jul 2008 My paper in TREE is now available as an in-press corrected proof. It is titled “The roles, reasons and restrictions of science blogs”, so thanks to you guys (and Bob O’Hara in particular) for the raw material and opportunities. Read More
Language log is a great blog, but that’s not one of their better posts (anything by Mark Lieberman is great, though Pullum is usually excellent too). The only problem here is the excessive zeal and officiousness of the British police. Two local (to me) examples: Oxfordshire police charged a student with hate speech after he said to a policeman “do you realize your horse is gay?” And more recently, when someone threw a water bottle to a protestor sitting in a tree, the police charged him with littering. In both cases the courts threw out the cases and money was wasted.
That’s what happens when you’ve hired too many police in the name of political expediency, and now they’re looking for something to do to justify their existence. Apparently it happens on the left as well as the right (for the right, “security” is the buzzword, rather than hate-speech.)
I suppose that I simply assumed that, as one of the cool intellectual bloggers, you already knew about Language Log. In any event, glad you found it.
Jeff, note in the 2 examples I gave if there was an agenda it was certainly not left-wing. In both cases (including the one using hate speech legislation) the target were environmental protestors. I suspect it is the police using a handy tool to do their master’s bidding, not their promotion of a left-wing agenda.
Jeff, note in the 2 examples I gave if there was an agenda it was certainly not left-wing. In both cases (including the one using hate speech legislation) the target were environmental protestors. I suspect it is the police using a handy tool to do their master’s bidding, not their promotion of a left-wing agenda.
Neil, it’s the not the target but the source that I was considering. Maybe I’m wrong, but I see the British government as being somewhat to the left of the USA’s. I also don’t see them as actively promoting a left wing agenda. I wouldn’t be surprised if many of them need to look like they’re doing something. I may be wrong in associating “security” with the right, though. I’ve heard the security in Britain is very tight – tracking everyone and their cars wherever they go, etc.
Jeff, *all* Western governments, probably all other properly elected governments, are to the left of the US govt. In any case, the decision to prosecute is not up to the govt: it is a police and DPP matter. Neither are conceivably left-wing.