Whew! (Spiders!) 6 Mar 2008 After a three day workshop on the future and nature of taxonomy (or systematics; I’m still unconvinced there’s a difference) I am exhausted and enthused. The former because of the massive amounts of beer we drank, and the latter, well, because of the massive amounts of beer we drank, and the conversations that followed. In particular I am very impressed by Quentin Wheeler’s International Institute for Species Exploration, and the outreach program, “Planet Bob“, both of which stress the vital need to identify, describe and study the planet’s biodiversity in detail before it is all gone (and so it can be retained and not lost!). What is most interesting to me as a philosopher is that the IISE includes philosophers, historians and sociologists in its project. And the history of systematics (or taxonomy), a subject dear to my heart, is crucial. If we want to ensure that we actually do the systematics of life, rather than just talk about it or make available the old knowledge, funding, and therefore understanding of the need, for taxonomy must be found, and found now. An excellent talk by Norman Platnick on spider taxonomy convinced me that this is not a pipe dream – we can achieve a complete taxonomy within our lifetimes. But not if we insist on using simplistic measures like “DNA Barcoding” as a substitute for actual taxonomy. I gave a talk that nobody beat me up on afterwards, on the philosophy of taxonomy, so it has been fun. Now to rest for a day or so… John Lynch gave me tickets to go see Dawkins tonight. Anyone in Phoenix want to go with me? I have one spare, as Lynch has to deal with kids or somesuch. Ecology and Biodiversity Species and systematics
Ecology and Biodiversity What is a disease? 13 Feb 200818 Sep 2017 Biology does normativity all the time. There are things that are the “normal” type of state of a species, an organism, an ecosystem, and so on, and things that are abnormal. But the puzzling thing is that all philosophers know, since David Hume, that normativity doesn’t develop out of facts…. Read More
Biology Taxonomist’s revenge 21 Jun 2009 There’s a long and distinguished history of taxonomists taking revenge upon friends and enemies (sometimes simultaneously!) by naming unpleasant things after them. Linnaeus himself named an ugly useless weed after his major critic, Siegesbeck, who had attacked the “sexual system” of Linnaean botany. More recently, Quentin Wheeler named three types… Read More
History In defence of taxonomists [plus ça change] 7 Mar 20187 Mar 2018 I sympathize with the physiologist or ecologist, who after he has written a luminous paper on a Cratoegus or Viola, or Rosa, or Opuntia, endeavors to ascertain the proper name for his plant; but I do not sympathize with his objurgations against the whole tribe of species makers. There is… Read More
Anyone in Phoenix want to go with me? I have one spare, as Lynch has to deal with kids or somesuch I wouldn’t mind going – that might be interesting. I’m in Tucson right now and it takes at least 90 min to get there, so the sooner the better.
Systematics is the toolkit we use to make taxonomies. Systematics is comparative biology which informes labeling and filing. Sometimes I am a systematic biologist; other times I am a fish taxonomist.