The Philosophy Club 26 Sep 201226 Sep 2012 There are an increasing number of initiatives to present philosophy and critical thinking to school students, and I am pleased to announce a new one in my home city of Melbourne: The Philosophy Club for ages 8 to 11. As I have argued in print, earlier conceptual acquisitions tend to greatly affect downstream beliefs, so teaching kids to question early will mean they are more inquisitive and less accepting of simple appeals to authority later, which means a critical populace. I therefore expect it to be legislated against shortly… Australian stuff Education Logic and philosophy Pop culture
Evolution Philosophy is to science, as ornithologists are to birds: 3. Science is a Dynamic Process 6 Jun 200724 Nov 2022 In this post, I want to propose my own view, or rather the views I have come to accept, about the nature of science. [Part 1; Part 2] Read More
Humor Jon Stewart is the New Socrates 23 Oct 2007 According to a book mentioned by Greg Dahlman at blog.bioethics.net. He notes that this makes Stephen Colbert Plato. I think it makes Hilary Clinton Aristotle, and Richard Dawkins Epicurus, although the sequence is a bit messed up. Read More
Logic and philosophy A blog worth reading 8 Aug 2007 Kate Devitt, a PhD student at Rutgers, as a rather wonderful blog, Mnemosynosis, on matters relating to memory. She’s got at present a very interesting post on bacterial cognition worth reading. Read More
Lots of things are subversive, but being judged ‘subversive’ may lend philosophy a certain cachet that makes it more attractive. On the other hand there are so many different philosophical schools of thought that you can envisage the subversive forces shattering into internal conflict…
… being judged ‘subversive’ … All good teaching is subversive, though perhaps not always in a way that the authorities find threatening.
I used to figure that studying mathematics and science should be as much as most students needed of philosophy but seeing the incredibly low level ability of even real scientists to deal with ideas outside of their specialty, not to mention the abysmal level of thought among the blog sci-rangers, The Philosophy Club is urgently needed. It’s unfortunate that they started calling natural philosophy “science”. It seems to have led a lot of people to not understand that science depends on logic and that it is inextricably embedded in the vicissitudes of humans and our minds confronting the same universe that philosophy deals with in a more encompassing way.
Let me give a plug for Q Is for Question, a book written and illustrated by a former student of mine. http://www.qisforquestion.com/Welcome.html