Politics Taking the veil [away] 6 May 2010 I am profoundly conflicted about European attempts to ban the burqa, that form of dress that covers all of a woman and leaves only a gauze strip for her eyes. On the one hand I think it is dehumanising, enslaving and deeply sexist. On the other, I do not think… Read More
Creationism and Intelligent Design Testing universal common ancestry 13 May 2010 A long time ago, a young graduate student wandered into the festering cesspool of creationists and evolutionists known as talk.origins and offered to write a FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions page) on whether or not macroevolution and common descent were supported by evidence. I had previously published a philosophical treatment of… Read More
Philosophy The dogs do bark… 2 Apr 2010 In yet another attempt to special plead for their religion, Australian church leaders have again raised the old canard that “atheists are believers who hate God”. No, that would be a kind of theism, Archbishop Jensen. It’s not hard. This is basic philosophy of religion. You did do some in… Read More
The thing to do is write a sensationalist book that gets tons of press and stirs up controversy. Possible titles: “Why I Am (Probably) Not A Christian” “God Is (Almost Certainly) Not Great” “Breaking the Spell (To The Extent It Needs Breaking)” “A Plague On Both Their Houses” “The Greatest Show On Earth (So Far)” “Everything I Need To Know I Learned In (Years and Years of Study and Thinking)”
Knowing that you don’t know doesn’t lend itself to feelings of superiority, even if it is the “beginning of wisdom.”
Riboyzyme – ??? Do mean that in such cases knowing that you don’t know _does_ lend itself to feelings of superiority???
Just makes me feel uncomfortable as I suspect if I lived in the States I would have the same perspective as a New Athiest. I can look at the older generation of my family and ask a comparable though by no means identical question. Most who were around in the 1930’s and 40’s were very active in both the communist party and the I.R.A. Not organisations I have a great deal of time for. Ask what you would do living in the enviroment they were leads to some uncomfortable conclusions.
PZ posted it, too. You are [probably] mentioned in comment #120. You will not be shocked to know that some people wrote unpleasant things about agnostics. You don’t think they are feeling superior, do you? http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2010/08/best_xkcd_ever.php#comments
What I found interesting in that thread was a few people discussing Fullmetal Alchemist, which doesn’t seem to have much to do with the thread topic, but is full of win regardless.
A- “Personally, I find agnostics to feel superior to everyone else”. B- “Well, at least you’ve found a way to feel superior to agnostics while oversimplifying their position.”
I think it had to do more (in general) with accommodationists, like Mooney, et. al. who wage their war of fact-less insinuation about the defective personalities and strategies of the “gnu atheists.” And not agnostics. Unless, of course, you’re making your own personal beliefs known… 🙂
Well I have argued for accommodationism several times, and criticised the aggressiveness of atheist exclusivism, so sure.
“atheist exclusivism” Now that is a useful term -far more thoughtful than “new atheists,” and “non-exclusivism” is far better than “accomodationism.”
MosesZD, I think if XKCD wanted to take a swipe at accommodationists, it probably wouldn’t do it so obliquely. The comic would hardly even make sense as such a swipe, since accommodationists in general don’t think atheists are smug. BTW, as a geek whose a bit into Linux, the label “gnu atheist” looks more like a description of an atheist who’s almost (?) religiously into Free Software.