Strong reciprocity 22 Sep 2007 On Friday I assessed an essay by a masters student on the evolution of reciprocity and altruism (she cleverly introduced a notion of benevolent behaviour rather than “altruism” in social contexts, to avoid confusion with genetic altruism. Then today my various feeds identified this rather excellent essay (more of a review paper, really) on strong reciprocity (the idea that we humans will behave reciprocally even if there is no individual payoff) by Benoit Hardy-Valée, of the University of Toronto. In this paper, he challenges what he calls “The Collective”, a group of conservative Darwinian thinkers who attempt to found natural rights on biology. The paper is full of insights and links and references. I strongly recommend it. Evolution Politics Social evolution
Philosophy Focus on the “how”, not the “why” 12 Aug 2009 [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kH40zaUxTTE&hl=en&fs=1&] Read More
Accommodationism Science outreach: A conversation 2 Feb 201420 Feb 2014 From the Freethinkers Blog Con: With PZ Myzer and Aron Ra. Read More
Biology Names and nomenclature in classification 17 Jul 2010 One of the main focuses in the literature, especially in biology, regarding classification is the problem of nomenclature, of names. Many treat classification as being all about names, an error that is akin to mistaking not the map for the territory, but the names on the map for the territory…. Read More
The idea of strong reciprocity has a certain emotional appeal. It leaves us warm and comfortable that we humans are kind and just because… well, just because! No need to investigate further, nothing to see here. Case closed. We’re just nice, and that’s that. I agree with the author- it’s not that neat or simple.
Interesting paper! Speaking of evolving reciprocity, have you seen this recent study? (sorry this is just a popular account of it; I couldn’t find any linkable journal version). Apparently monkeys will protest if some get unequal pay for equal work. No word if they start singing the Internationale in Capuchin. Still, it shows that evolving concepts of fairness and justice, essential in any societal reciprocity, happened a lot longer ago than those who use our innate “goodness” as evidence for some special place for humanity in the scheme of things would allow.