Putnam on taxonomic terms 29 Jan 202029 Jan 2020 Terms with respect to which we defer to experts include both technical terms in science and such terms as ‘elm’ or ‘beech’ (in the United States, at least, most people cannot tell an elm from a beech, but anyone who knows that ‘elm’ and ‘beech’ are the names of common sorts of deciduous trees counts as understanding them)…. Still, the great majority of the terms we employ are neither analytically defined nor such that we need to call on an expert to advise us in their application in everyday use. Hilary Putnam. “XV—Pragmatism.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95, no. 1 (June 1, 1995): 291–306, p298. Bear this in mind when debating whether dinosaurs and birds or humans are apes… Philosophy Species and systematics Systematics
Species and systematics Some more of Whewell on classification 25 Feb 200918 Sep 2017 This is a kind of note to myself, an aide memoire to remind me of the fact that much of the modern narrative about classification in biology before Darwin is not correct. It’s also interesting that Whewell defines systematics, but most interesting is the reinforcement of the prior note that… Read More
Epistemology Atheism, agnosticism and theism: the landscape, part 1 15 Jul 201125 Jul 2011 In the Socrates Café (Sydney) talk based on my paper “Could God have set up Darwinian Accidents?”, I addressed about 70 people, only a couple of whom were philosophers (hi Rachel, hi Tim). I like doing these talks, because they allow me to make what is otherwise fairly dry technical… Read More
Metaphysics Thought for the day: Why is “now” now? 2 Apr 2010 I am something of an amateur block theorist (which means that I only imperfectly instantiate a spacetime worm). Actually, it means I think that the universe exists as a single unitary entity extended in however many dimensions it is, including time. It’s, as it were, a block, not a river…. Read More