Evolution Out of the mouths of [mental] babes 2 Jun 2008 Creationism is being pushed legislatively in Texas again. But this line is priceless, from State Board of Education vice chairman, David Bradley (yes, you guessed, a Republican): Bradley said he doesn’t foresee any successful effort to remove the “strengths and weaknesses” requirement from the science standards. “There are issues in… Read More
Creationism and Intelligent Design The hope of the future of the Illuminati 15 Apr 2010 With young folk like this on the case, I have hope for the future of the evil atheist conspiracy… Read More
Creationism and Intelligent Design New work on lateral transfer shows that Darwin was wrong 31 Mar 200918 Sep 2017 A new study into the transfer of genetic material laterally, or across taxonomic divisions, has shown that evolution does not proceed as Darwin thought, and that in fact the present theory of evolution is entirely false. Instead, it transpires that lateral genetic transfer makes new species much more like Empedocles‘… Read More
Yes I did worry too much about that question (among others), but then I realized that the word “vowel” does indeed have vowels, so at least some self-referential order is restored in the universe. Why separate form and substance if you don’t have to?
Hold on — I thought of one: ha?ek contains a ha?ek! (It works on preview. Of course, with ScienceBlogs horrible Unicode support, you’ll probably just see some ASCII junk when I hit Post.)
Hold on — I thought of one: ha?ek contains a ha?ek! (It works on preview. Of course, with ScienceBlogs horrible Unicode support, you’ll probably just see some ASCII junk when I hit Post.)
A simple trick will make sure that UTF-8 gets through: do not ever use the preview window. There are sometimes spelling errors in my comments, because I can’t use the preview for proofreading. The glorious umlaut in my name would get borked.
A simple trick will make sure that UTF-8 gets through: do not ever use the preview window. There are sometimes spelling errors in my comments, because I can’t use the preview for proofreading. The glorious umlaut in my name would get borked.
A simple trick will make sure that UTF-8 gets through: do not ever use the preview window. There are sometimes spelling errors in my comments, because I can’t use the preview for proofreading. The glorious umlaut in my name would get borked.
A simple trick will make sure that UTF-8 gets through: do not ever use the preview window. There are sometimes spelling errors in my comments, because I can’t use the preview for proofreading. The glorious umlaut in my name would get borked.
And why aren’t all occurrences of the word “red” not red? And why do I see no websites that show every occurrence of the word “big” in font size=+8? And so on.
Since we’re being pedantic – we weren’t? well so what? – I am sure diaerisis is the correct spelling. Now, on the thread subject, what about humans? – eg there was a minister in the New South Wales government called Aquilina with an aquiline nose; our esteemed Vice-Chancellor here at ANU is called Chubb and has a chubby face. Questions for serious consideration – was Albert Schweitzer in fact Swiss? Was Ike Eisenhower from an ironworking family? Did either Roosevelt own a field of roses? (Did Margaret Thatcher teach Sir Geoffrey Howe? Sorry – couldn’t resist it.) The people want to know. Alas, our Prime Minister Rudd is not especially ruddy-featured.
Gesundheit! WIN! HTML Entities used: Ümläüt? háček? (NB: This uses the Unicode character LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH CARON’ (U+010D)) háček? (NB: This uses Unicode character LATIN SMALL LETTER C (U+0063) COMBINING CARON (U+030C)) Reference used: http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/index.htm
Gesundheit! WIN! HTML Entities used: Ümläüt? háček? (NB: This uses the Unicode character LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH CARON’ (U+010D)) háček? (NB: This uses Unicode character LATIN SMALL LETTER C (U+0063) COMBINING CARON (U+030C)) Reference used: http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/index.htm
Hm. The server headers do not appear to include a character set specification. The header of this page includes: <meta http-equiv=”Content-Type” content=”text/html; charset=iso-8859-1” /> Isn’t that something you can directly configure to be UTF-8 on your end?