My present work 10 Oct 2010 Life can be … interesting, for Chinese values thereof. No, I don’t mean the Nobel Prize, although good choice. I mean that I’m presently undergoing some kind of curse. I think it’s called “work” . Work!? So what I’m doing doesn’t translate to meaningful blog posts. Not always (but eventually, sure). I’m going to be doing this in the near future: 1. A lecture on the rise and nature of social Darwinism (and how that is a very bad term). My course on Darwin, Philosophy and Society has to be completely revised in the light of the fact that most of my students are doing counselling rather than philosophy and history for its own sake. Apropos of which: “History should be written as philosophy” [Voltaire, Letters, 31 Oct. 1738] I should have used that as an epigraph for my book, although I can’t find a primary source. 2. A talk on Agnosticism – basically I’ll argue that one can taxonomise the conceptual landscape in several ways; and that being an agnostic about some gods doesn’t mean I am necessarily asserting that all gods are unknowable, nor that I am not an atheist about other gods. It’s the indexing argument again. Hey: They haven’t heard it yet. 3. Drafting a paper on Leonardo da Vinci, pterosaurs, phylogenetic bracketing, and the difference between homology and analogy with a very clever young man, Chris Glen. Who should finish his PhD before I Frown at him again. A major paper in Current Biology is not enough, you know… 4. Drafting chapters of a book: The Nature of Classification with a very clever slightly older (than Chris) man, Malte Ebach, with whom I am also trying to write a grant application. Two words: “Soil Science”. Who knew it would be so interesting? 5. Moving house. 6. Finding a house to move to (that comes before the last one, I hope). 7. Undergoing a sleep study to find out how badly I have apnoea and what to do about it. So forgive my apparent inactivity. I’m actually working harder than a socialist candidate in an American electorate. Administrative Education Evolution Philosophy Religion Systematics AdministrativeEvolutionNatural ClassificationPhilosophy
Evolution Mechanism, informationism and Ockhamism 24 Feb 200818 Sep 2017 Welcome to this week’s edition of Isms. In a couple of posts, Scibling Alex Palazzo of The Daily Transcript has given two quite distinct views of what biology is about: information, and mechanism. In the first he argues that what is needed to build organisms is information, and in the… Read More
Epistemology Prescriptions for atheists 25 Nov 201122 Jun 2018 Jeez. You go away for a few days, to the beach and countryside, and come back to find that progress has been made in philosophy; in particular regarding the right view to hold about religion and the religious. The story so far: I wrote a series of posts about agnosticism,… Read More
Evolution Evolution quotes: Darwin on randomness 25 Jun 2010 Some authors have declared that natural selection explains nothing, unless the precise cause of each slight individual difference be made clear. Now, if it were explained to a savage utterly ignorant of the art of building, how the edifice had been raised stone upon stone, and why wedge-formed fragments were… Read More
Undergoing a sleep study to find out how badly I have apnoea and what to do about it. Been there and done that.
Well I’ve been there now. I will have done that when I get the results. In the meantime, local seismologists are concerned over the effect I’m having on New Zealand’s tectonic stresses.
John, Agnosis (in this context) is highly interesting to me and I’m looking forward to learning more- if you will post the paper eventually. (Or send me to some other source you’ve already completed). Meanwhile, best wishes for the house search and move.
à M.[Nicolas-Claude] Thieriot, 31 October 1738 “Je pense comme mr l’abbé St Pierre, qu’il faut écrire l’histoire en philosofe, mais je me flatte qu’il pense comme moy qu’i ne faut pas écrire en précepteur, et qu’un historien doit instruire le genre human sans faire le pédagogue.” page 1186, tome 1, Voltaire Correspondance, ed. Theodore Besterman, Paris: Gallimard, Biblitheque de la Pleiade, 1964
Good luck with all this. Are you sure you’ve got quite enough to do? (Most of *my* students *need* counselling!) “qu’il faut écrire l’histoire en philosofe”. My French is fairly shaky these days, but this seems to mean “we should (must?) write history as a philosopher would”. Maybe not quite the same as “history should be written as philosophy”, but perhaps a real French speaker could enlighten us about the nuances.
Apropos of little: I’m shocked that they know about Maynard G. Krebs in Australia. Few enough people even remember him here. What a shame that his memory was sullied by that offensive fellow Gilligan.