Lazy Manager Theory 18 Nov 2009 Some people have asked me how I did a PhD, and wrote and taught a subject, while I was also manager of a department of graphic artists, receptionists, and animators, and did the annual report and various other publications. The answer is: Lazy Manager Theory The principle is: if you are working too hard, you are working inefficiently. The most efficient manager does almost nothing. This is because you should allow your staff to do their work unimpeded, and only get involved when one of them is having trouble (usually, if you have employed the right people, due to some client, not their capabilities). Below the fold are the Rules of LMT. Rule No 1: Never do any piece of paperwork when the person who asked for it isn’t there and holding it when they make the request. If they don’t care enough to come see you, they probably don’t need it done. Also, you put faces to names and develop a good personal relationship with those who come to see you, so it’s win-win. Rule No 2: If any piece of paper falls off your desk for any reason, throw it away. This is God’s way of telling you it is unimportant. Rule No 3: Do what you want to do even if it contradicts Rules 1 and 2. You have a brain, so use it. When it matters to you, then it is important enough to do. This will get your paper work down to 5% of what it presently is, and allow you to focus on what matters (i.e., internetting or studying history and philosophy of science). Rule No 4: Never do the most urgent thing on your to do list. If you are constantly worried about getting things done, you will lose your game. You are much more productive if you do the second most important thing. There’s a frisson of guilty pleasure, and anyway, the most important thing will become the second most important thing soon enough. Rule No 5: Remember that compliance helps those who seek it, not you. Assume minimal compliance – things that are required by law or which might get you fired if you don’t do them are the most you should ordinarily do. If you do any more, either it had better serve your needs, or be something you just love doing. If there’s no payoff to you, simply put it to the bottom of your pile (and then see rules 1 and 2). This way, people learn about what you will do and what you won’t, and will start to behave accordingly. Do not think that someone else’s problem is your own, unless it really is. Rule 6: Do not volunteer for committees. Committees are almost always a way to not do anything important. However, if there is a chance that a committee will interfere with what you are employed to do, either make sure a member of staff is on it (which can help their career too), or if you must, go yourself. Rule 6a: Never be an office bearer on a committee. Codicil 1: If you must, be the secretary. You get to write the minutes with no requirement for actual activity. Rule 6b: Always sit on the left side of the table, at the far end from the secretary if you aren’t that person. This way when tasks are being handed out, you are less likely to be volunteered, as you are not in the immediate line of sight of either the chair or the secretary. Rule 6c: Never miss a meeting, or you will be given a task. Rule 7: Ensure that you are friendly with the personal assistants and the security staff. They are able to make your life either very hard or very easy. Rule 8: If you run a service department, allow nobody to harass your client service staff. If someone gets physically or verbally abusive, ban them on the spot and stick to it. Everybody else will be very nice to you and your staff thereafter, which means your staff will work harder, and you’ll get nice chocolates at Christmas. Once I had a scientist shout at my staff (a woman, although it wouldn’t have mattered). I got nose to nose with him and told him that sort of behaviour was unsuitable and uncalled-for, and that he would never have another job done through my department, so if he needed work done he had better be able to get someone else from his lab to bring it down and see it through. He shouted and threatened me with the Director’s wrath, but I told him he could go to the Queen for all I cared – we weren’t ever going to do any more work for him. I should add he had been a bit nasty to my staff beforehand. I never heard another thing officially, so I presume the Director told him he was a jerk. But if she hadn’t, I was prepared to take it to a formal complaint, so it was in the Institute’s (i.e., the various managers – see Rule 10) interests not to pursue it. And all the scientists knew what had happened within a day, so my staff were treated very well after that. Rule 9: Trust your staff. Tell them, “So long as you do your job, I don’t need to know what you are doing. If you have a problem, come see me immediately so I can help you fix it or resolve it. Otherwise, if I have a problem, I’ll come see you. The rest of the time, you are responsible for your own work. Have fun.” It worked very well indeed. If you need to be micromanaging staff, and you almost never do, then you have the wrong person in the job, and either have to change the job, or change the person. On the latter, I have no real advice to give. It’s a bugger. Can’t shoot ’em, can’t fire them, in Australia, anyway. Rule 10: Never assume that corporate entities – departments, programs, projects or companies – have interests. Many people have been tripped up by thinking “They won’t do that. It’s not in the <insert corporate thing here>’s interests”. Then they do that. Of course, it was in the interests of this or that person, who could give a rat’s arse about the interests of the organisation. Philosophers, in particular, tend to think that corporations are somehow rational agents. Every manager and player within them is, of course, in that they will seek to maximise their own payoffs as they see them, but this almost never coincides with the “interests” of the corporate entity. Hospitals are not there to treat patients, for example. They are there so that specialists can make a lot of money, and administrators can increase their status and salaries. If a hospital does effectively treat patients, it is because doing so meets the individual payoffs of the actors that run the hospital, by decree from government or in accidental virtue of funding arrangements. If you realise you are dealing with individual agents with agendas, you will not mistake their actions for those of an enlightened corporate body. So, there is the Lazy Manager Theory, or, how I did a PhD while Working Full-Time and Raising a Family. It worked very well. I never did paperwork to speak of (my staff’s HR files were a quarter the width of other staff, and yet they got their increments every year), and my staff would work, of their own accord, weekends and nights to get a job done, because they cared about the work. I had to tell them to go home to their families. That is a sign that this works. And I was able to teach, write a thesis, go to some conferences, and generally behave like a graduate student. And now I are a philosopher… Administrative Philosophy trashcan categorial Truisms
Biology Names and nomenclature in classification 17 Jul 2010 One of the main focuses in the literature, especially in biology, regarding classification is the problem of nomenclature, of names. Many treat classification as being all about names, an error that is akin to mistaking not the map for the territory, but the names on the map for the territory…. Read More
Book FAPP on the doorstep 12 May 2010 My copy of What Darwin Got Wrong by Fodor and Piatelli-Palmarini has arrived and was waiting at the door for me this AM. God the British mail system is fast to Australia! Now I owe a series of posts on Rossano’s book first, but perhaps I will read FAPP on… Read More
Epistemology Notes on novelty 5: Evolutionary radiations and individuation 31 Dec 201115 Jan 2012 Notes on Novelty series: 1. Introduction 2. Historical considerations – before and after evolution 3: The meaning of evolutionary novelty 4: Examples – the beetle’s horns and the turtle’s shell 5: Evolutionary radiations and individuation 6: Levels of description 7: Surprise! 8: Conclusion – Post evo-devo Sometime around 1900, Henry Fairfield Osborn (the Ernst Mayr of… Read More
Actually remarkably similar to my modus operandi when I had a staff (of two) and was running a scholarship office. Except for this bit: “so my staff were teated very well after that”. We didn’t allow teating … except maybe after the holiday party.
Those may be the rules for a graphic arts department, but they aren’t the rules for a philosophy department! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruces_sketch
Actually, getting philosophers to do paperwork is nearly impossible. But stopping them from working on their own is impossible.
The principle is: if you are working too hard, you are working inefficiently. The most efficient manager does almost nothing. This is because you should allow your staff to do their work unimpeded, and only get involved when one of them is having trouble (usually, if you have employed the right people, due to some client, not their capabilities). This vile rule has caused me to waste untold hours of my time in the offices of all sorts of bureaucrats. It is the principle reason why American health insurance has so far been utterly worthless to me. It’s ruined several otherwise good jobs for me. It’s a way of stealing time from other people. It’s evil, it’s disgusting, and every moral person hates it.
My apologies – I quoted the wrong piece of text. I intended: Rule No 1: Never do any piece of paperwork when the person who asked for it isn’t there and holding it when they make the request. If they don’t care enough to come see you, they probably don’t need it done. Also, you put faces to names and develop a good personal relationship with those who come to see you, so it’s win-win. This vile rule has caused me to waste untold hours of my time in the offices of all sorts of bureaucrats. It is the principle reason why American health insurance has so far been utterly worthless to me. It’s ruined several otherwise good jobs for me. It’s a way of stealing time from other people. It’s evil, it’s disgusting, and every moral person hates it.
I grew up in the theatre and grew use to some bad working practises that I carry into study. i.e I have a tendancy not to switch off, I am use to constantly pouring over, memorizing texts at every spare moment as time is short. No excuses for not doing the work in the theatre; the deadline is final. I constantly get lost in thought and find myself walking into lamp-posts on the odd occasion. Family life seems to temper these bad habits but I am just to use to working in such a manner to throw it off entirely. I have never worked in an office. My best work seems to occur when I am totaly wrapped up in it and moments away from the lamp-post and an abrupt and rude return to the planet.
Philosophers, in particular, tend to think that corporations are somehow rational agents. Corporations have neither bodies to be punished, nor souls to be condemned; they therefore do as they like.
I had full time funding to do a ph.d. and I didn’t get a thesis written … Perhaps I shoulda had a family, but I think it’d be cruel to get one just to get rid of it once I was done.
Good for you. You sat on your ass while others did the tough work. You should be so proud of yourself. This is what is wrong with the world. The laziest people get the biggest cake jobs and paid the most. You r nothing but a poly-tic to the rest of us who break our backs so we can support our family and stuff money into rich men and women’s pockets for their scraps. People like you think you are so smart but the reality of it is you just were born with a egotistical mind set that allows you to slide through the cracks of modern day society. It’s a temporary glitch that will soon be coded out by the many who are tired of it. While I agree with you about not micromanaging I can’t stand managers like you. Get on the ground floor with your underlings and do what they do. Take some burden off them and they will have way more respect for you. Maybe they act respectful to your face it is just because of the money thing. 20 to 1 says they go home and bash your gluttony to their significant other without fear of losing their job because of the money thing. Lol. So many people are now dumber because this is on the Internet. If the sh$t ever hits the fan it’s people like you that will be the first to need help or better yet, parish. I hope I’m alive long enough to see this type of mindset change in the world. A good manager gets his hands dirty AND surrounds themselves with capable staff that are professionals in their craft so they don’t need to ever be micromanaged. I love my manager but he has this mindset and someday I will be his boss if he lasts long enough. I see these games he plays and as an employee I play games too because of that. I don’t break my back everyday for him. I do it for my family and plan on moving above and beyond him. The people we serve know who to go to when they want to get something done, and it isn’t my manager
So glad you are able to work out my style of work from afar. I spent hours doing my work and ensuring that the department ran smoothly and nobody ever complained – in fact my ex-staff still ask when I am returning when I go to visit them ten years later. But I worked efficiently and yes, I worked at the coalface. It sounds to me like you have your own issues, not mine.
Good one. I just gave you a 3 paragraph synopsis of my issues. People like you, lazy managers. Lol. Try getting in another mans face outside of work in a dark alley and see what happens. You won’t and never have because you won’t have your games with you.