Competition for public funds 26 May 201126 May 2011 Ever wondered why education, research, health care and public infrastructure is being wound back across the western world? This chart, from here, on the American debt, suggests why: In the competition between various calls on the public purse, it looks like the military and the plutocracy have won out. We don’t always think of what is happening in the “democratic” west as being a militaristic and robber baron society, but on these sorts of figures, it looks like it. Politics
History Harry Potter, you see, is the wrong kind of magician 15 Jan 2008 In an article on the Catholic or otherwise virtues of Harry Potter (didn’t we do all this a while back), L’Osservatore Romano has an article claiming that Harry Potter is the wrong kind of hero. Why is that? Not, as you might think, because there are wizards in it –… Read More
Politics Red right 10 Oct 2008 Ever wondered why it’s “red states”? Because it’s the “red right”. And as one of my favourite Australian lyricists has it, this is because of the red right hand: Take a little walk to the edge of town, go across the tracks Where the viaduct looms, like a bird of… Read More
History How to fix Iraq, and not invade Iran 28 Sep 200718 Sep 2017 There’s been a lot of media spin and unthinking objections to the visit of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to the US. He was called the “modern Hitler”, for example. This strikes me as both unthinking and dangerous. Ahmadinejad is his own kind of threat and problem, and comparisons to past dangerous… Read More
Actually, the military looks like a relatively small part of it. The biggest factor is the Bush tax cut, which I suppose is what you’re counting as “plutocracy”. Second to that is the economy, stupid, which may be the fault of the plutocrats, but doesn’t make it seem as if they’re winning, especially. TARP, etc., is almost nothing. Wars are the third factor, but a distant third.
What’s happening with the U.S. Federal budget, in the short run, is that the annual shortfall in tax revenue (and the additional welfare burdens) due to the recession will flatten out and eventually decline to zero; the economic stimuluses will end over a few years and thenceforth cost nothing; the TARP, Fannie/Freddie, auto industry and other bailouts will end up costing the budget virtually nothing (because, despised they may be, bailouts always work as intended); and the costs of our foreign adventures should level out and thus take a smaller percentage of the GDP as the economy grows (though why we should continue to pay for a military designed to such a degree to fight another superpower is another matter). As the chart shows, due to the Bush tax cuts our fiscal system will be structured such that, not only will we be unable to pay for what we wish to buy, but that the shortfall in tax revenue will actually accelerate, even assuming the economy returns to health growth. In the long run, past the scope of the chart, the deficit will continue to be driven mainly by these same tax cuts, until the 2030s, when the budget will become dominated by the costs of medical care, as reflected in Medicare and Medicade. Here perhaps plutocracy may be again evoked, as no other rich country is likely to have these problems so manifestly, given their willingness to adopt economically sound tax and medical systems.