Arthur C. Clarke dies 18 Mar 2008 When I was about 8, I read in a newspaper that one of my favourite short stories, “The Sentinel”, by Arthur C. Clarke, was to be made into a movie by some film maker I never heard of. I had to wait 5 years to see 2001, A Space Odyssey. The last of the golden age science fiction writers, who thought that anything was possible, has died. Fiction General Science History
Biology What is systematics and what is taxonomy? 5 Feb 201123 Jul 2023 Over the past few years there have been increasing numbers of calls for governments to properly fund systematics and taxonomy (and a number of largely molecular-focused biologists insisting they can do the requisite tasks with magic molecule detectors, so don’t fund old-school, fund new-fangled-tech). But I think that there is… Read More
Epistemology Two kinds of natural classification, and hybrid classifications 11 Aug 2010 It is fairly clear to anyone reading the last century’s discussions about classification that there are, with respect to natural classification, two main approaches. These are roughly: classification based on shared causal properties, and classification based upon shared phenomenal properties. In the debates between the “pheneticists” who used computer-based techniques… Read More
Creationism and Intelligent Design Orthodox Jews and evolution 1 Nov 2008 I used to think that Jews in general were able to avoid the confusion of biblical literalism with their rich tradition of allegorical and other forms of interpretation and commentary, but it seems that there are some – haredim – who follow the example of the Lubavitcher Rebbe and dismiss… Read More
I was lucky enough to see 2001 once in the full original Cinerama format. It was the nearest thing to a transcendental religious experience I’ve ever had. Clarke may not have been the greatest writer of dialogue or character but he created worlds of the near future with a vividness and clarity that grabbed my imagination in a way that few other have equalled. It is a sad loss.
I saw the movie in 1968 at the Cinerama theater in Los Angeles and I still remember how stunned my friends and I were by the experience. While it may seem dated and ho-hum now, at the time it was fresh, sometimes beautiful, thought provoking and just a little confusing. Clark also wrote one of my favorite science fiction books, “Rendevous with Rama”.
I saw the movie in 1968 at the Cinerama theater in Los Angeles and I still remember how stunned my friends and I were by the experience. While it may seem dated and ho-hum now, at the time it was fresh, sometimes beautiful, thought provoking and just a little confusing. Clark also wrote one of my favorite science fiction books, “Rendevous with Rama”.
I saw the movie in 1968 at the Cinerama theater in Los Angeles and I still remember how stunned my friends and I were by the experience. While it may seem dated and ho-hum now, at the time it was fresh, sometimes beautiful, thought provoking and just a little confusing. Clark also wrote one of my favorite science fiction books, “Rendevous with Rama”.
I saw the movie in 1968 at the Cinerama theater in Los Angeles and I still remember how stunned my friends and I were by the experience. While it may seem dated and ho-hum now, at the time it was fresh, sometimes beautiful, thought provoking and just a little confusing. Clark also wrote one of my favorite science fiction books, “Rendevous with Rama”.
He was one of the great visionaries. The Fountains of Paradise is still one of my favourite novels. But there’s at least one Golden Age writer still kicking about… Ray Bradbury is alive.
He was one of the great visionaries. The Fountains of Paradise is still one of my favourite novels. But there’s at least one Golden Age writer still kicking about… Ray Bradbury is alive.
He was one of the great visionaries. The Fountains of Paradise is still one of my favourite novels. But there’s at least one Golden Age writer still kicking about… Ray Bradbury is alive.
I happened across The City And The Stars in a used book store last year. I had read the book when I was about fifteen, but I didn’t have any specific impression of it. Rereading it last year, I was stunned at what a moving work it was. I’ve been a big fan of Clarke ever since I read Rendezvous with Rama when I was about ten years old. His later work (the stuff with Gentry Lee comes to mind) was disappointing, but his work during his prime stands as some of the greatest achievements in Science Fiction.
I share your perspective, John. I too “met” Arthur Charles Clarke when I hadn’t run out of fingers to count my age. I came to regard him, as well as certain other authors and scientists as friends. Because they either wrote lucid accounts of the latest discoveries or they were there at their first conception. Clarke did both. I will miss him not only for his memories sake, but for the things he didn’t live to say. Now it is up to us.
I share your perspective, John. I too “met” Arthur Charles Clarke when I hadn’t run out of fingers to count my age. I came to regard him, as well as certain other authors and scientists as friends. Because they either wrote lucid accounts of the latest discoveries or they were there at their first conception. Clarke did both. I will miss him not only for his memories sake, but for the things he didn’t live to say. Now it is up to us.
I was one of the few in my crowd who read the book 2001 before seeing the movie. Consequently, I was the one who got to explain WTH was going on to all my friends. But I was a Clarke addict from then on, until at least my 20s.