The forgotten Holocaust 15 Oct 2009 This is a disturbing essay by Timothy Snyder in the New York Review of Books, republished in Eurozine. It suggests that we do not remember the entirety of the Holocaust in German and Soviet hands. [H/T 3 Quarks Daily] History Politics Race and politics
Ecology and Biodiversity Wilkins breaks away from the pack 25 Mar 200818 Sep 2017 Okay, so it’s the Wilkins Ice Shelf, but it’s even more important than news about me. The 6000 square mile (15,540 km2) ice shelf named for Sir Hubert Wilkins, the famous Australian Antarctic explorer (and very possibly some kind of relation), is breaking off due to global warming. This is… Read More
Australian stuff This man is the best of Australia’s political landscape 10 Oct 201110 Oct 2011 I used to hate him, but I have come to the realisation that Malcolm Fraser is the very best Prime Minister, politician and senior statesman Australia has produced in my lifetime. He criticises his own party for its demagoguery and race the the lowest common denominator, and defends the rights… Read More
Logic and philosophy Reed Elsevier accepts criticism, drops arms support 2 Jun 200724 Nov 2022 Well blow me down and call me a dishmop. Reed Elsevier, who I recently criticised for running arms exhibitions while publishing medical and other intellectual journals, and who were boycotted by medical authors, has folded. They are, according to this story, getting out of the arms exhibition business. And so… Read More
I think that’s why some prefer Shoah to describe the German attempt to exterminate European Jewry, as opposed to the Holocaust, which now tends to refer to the attempted extermination of the Roma, Communists, and whoever else the Nazis decided were subhumans that needed killing. There’s a deeper history to the German side of the coin. In the Middle Ages, the Slavs occupied in the German mind much the same position that the Jews later came to. Hitler didn’t just simply invent Lebensraum out of the blue; Germans had long hated and feared the Slavs, and had pushed eastward. As with all the Nazi terrors, what the Nazis did was more a refinement of previous deeds and sentiments rather than wholesale invention. As to the Soviets, Stalin had long been using starvation and forced relocation as tools of oppression. I’m not sure its useful to get into a pissing game over whether Stalin and Hitler was worse. Stalin usually gets better grades because he (finally) lead the Soviets into an alliance with the British Empire and the United States to beat the Nazis. Churchill, at least, certainly was very well aware of the nature of his eastern ally, famously declaring “If Hitler invaded hell I would make at least a favorable reference to the devil in the House of Commons.” In a total war where Great Britain was battling for its very survival, she needed every ally she could get, even if it meant ultimately betraying the Poles and the Fins (both of which had been victims of Soviet expansionism). At the end of the day, if it’s a numbers game, then I’ll vote for Mao, who managed through stupidity, arrogance and blind ideology to kill somewhere between 20 and 40 million people. Admittedly, he didn’t set out to accomplish one of the worst (if not the worst) mass killings in our species’ history, but the Great Leap Forward, like the Holocaust and Stalin’s atrocities, was the product of ideology and economics. At the end of the day, whether the victims died in Auschwitz, a Siberian Gulag or in a village in Sichuan, they were victims of lunatic governments who put their own ideologies and cults of leadership worship above the essential right to life of some portion of the people under their power.