On inclusive fitness 2 Apr 201118 Sep 2017 Right now I am busy writing the grant application that determines the next ten years of my life, so excuse my absence. But instead of John Wilkins, let me point you to Jon Wilkins of Lost in Transcription. Jon has a cool web comic “Darwin Eats Cake” which discusses stuff I like, but recently he did one of those animated conversation movies on the recent challenge to the concept of inclusive fitness. He just now posted the background to this. Basically Martin Nowack, Carina Tarnita, and Edward O. Wilson of Harvard have attacked the notion as a mistake. Jon shows why it isn’t. My reading of it is that Wilson, who in collaboration with David Sloan Wilson has tried to reinstate group selection, is deprecating the obvious competitor to proper group selection, inclusive fitness. It is a wrong headed attack, and the appropriate response is Multilevel Selection – or one of them at any rate – rather than abandoning one of the most successful and elegant mathematical models in biology. If not for his unaccountable lack of the proper number of the letter “h” in his name, Jon Wilkins would be perfect. Evolution Evolution
Biology Hunting for the Hat Gene 16 Nov 2009 Mark Liberman has a good essay on why we shouldn’t be seeking genes for X here. Read More
Evolution A casual disregard for facts 22 Aug 200818 Sep 2017 A little while back I linked to Sahotra Sarkar’s review of Steve Fuller’s Science versus Religion. Now Fuller has put up a defence at the Intelligent Design website, Uncommon Descent, under the gerrymandered image of a bacterial flagellum (if you want to know what a real flagellum would look like… Read More
Evolution Evolution quotes 31 May 2010 Evolution itself, it must be remembered, does not necessarily mean, applied to society, the movement of man to a desirable goal. It is a neutral, scientific conception, compatible either with optimism or with pessimism. According to different estimates it may appear to be a cruel sentence or a guarantee of… Read More
Has anyone investigated the other kind of group selection, as in “selection by the group” rather than “selection of the group.” It would be somewhat analogous to sexual selection, and could perhaps act as an amplifier of inclusive fitness.
It’s grant season here as well. All the best to you. (If you need an inexpert but enthusiastic proofreader, give me a shout.) Barry
Isn’t the reification (if that’s the appropriate term to use) of “fitness” a large part of the problem in discussing these issues? Fitness is not a trait, unlike say body weight, thickness of fur, size of litter, but it gets discussed as if it is a heritable trait which all replicators have. Rather, fitness is a portmanteau way of summarising the effectiveness of entities in replicating or reproducing themselves. Of course group selection will appear if a researcher focuses on groups. And gene selection will appear when focusing on genes. But that doesn’t mean that those are the loci of “fitness”. D.S. Wilson has a group selection hammer, and he only sees group selection nails with the blind fervour of a true believer.
I’ve read Nowak’s new book (a review copy appeared in our letterbox, and I got to it first). It’s basically a shaggy dog story: the chapter on kin selection is there to set up the punchline at the end.
I have come across documentary evidence that a Chinese science writer plagiarized your essay “Spontaneous Generation and the Origin of Life.” His plagiarized piece is available at http://www.xys.org/xys/netters/Fang-Zhouzi/jingji/spontaneous_all.txt. At least two Chinese scholars in the United States have published their reviews of this case of plagiarism. Their articles are available at http://www.2250s.com/read.php?2-7544-7544 and http://www.de-sci.org/blogs/yijia/2009/09/26/%E6%8A%84%E4%B9%A6%E4%B8%BA%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E4%BC%9A%E6%8A%84%E9%94%99%EF%BC%9F/ If you need further information on this case, I shall promptly oblige.
I think you are right from the machine translation I saw. But I don’t know what to do. Chinese plagiarism laws are weak at best.
Good luck on that grant! I’ll be an enthusiastic and (mostly) engaged proofreader as well, if you you really need an outside person (musicology! what could be more outside?). Should I slack, blame it on getting my thesis corrected. 🙂 (Oh, I see you’re having an instant proofreading thingamabob. Awesome!!)