Couple new philosophy entries in SEP 10 Sep 2007 The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is an online, but highly regarded, source of review articles on philosophical topics, edited by Ed Zalta. Three new articles have popped up lately that have attracted my attention: The first is on Metaphysics, by Peter van Inwagen. Metaphysics is a hard discipline to define, by van Inwagen does a good job of presenting it for first time philosophers. The second is Causal Processes by my colleague Phil Dowe. Dowe is a leading light in the topic of causation, which itself is a topic of metaphysics, and he has proposed a “conserved quantity” account of casual process. The third is on Aristotle’s Categories, by Paul Studtmann. It is not easy to read Aristotle, because either technical terminology is used that derives from the late medieval and early modern logicians, or English words are used that sort of match the vernacular Greek terms Aristotle used (such as the “what it is to be”, which gets translated as “essence” in the Latin tradition). But Studtmann does a fair job of making him comprehensible. Aristotle’s book The Categories (also known as The Topics) is an attempt to classify all concepts in terms of ten apparently disconnected basic concepts, sometimes called “summum genera” in Latin. It is the foundation of all subsequent logic, and latterly, semantics. I know it because it is what the supposed essentialist story of species (another Latin term translating a Greek word eidos) is based on. [Buy the book 🙂 ] Logic and philosophy
Humor Achieving enplightenment – Amusing typogarphical errors 3 3 Oct 2007 The estimable and overproductive Neil Levy* at CAPPE at my alma mater, has sent me Terry Pratchett’s and Stephen Brigg’s book/diary Lu-Tse’s Yearbook of Enlightenment 2008, with a note “To help you chart your course into unemployment”. For which I give much thanks, as it also contains many analects of… Read More
Evolution “Species” in the Stanford Encyclopedia updated 13 Jun 200724 Nov 2022 Marc Ereshfsky’s entry on “Species” in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy has been updated, though not to remove the classic “Essentialism Story” that has been called into question by a number of scholars lately. Under the fold, I will quote Marc’s comments and critique them. [I can do this because… Read More
Logic and philosophy Reed Elsevier accepts criticism, drops arms support 2 Jun 200724 Nov 2022 Well blow me down and call me a dishmop. Reed Elsevier, who I recently criticised for running arms exhibitions while publishing medical and other intellectual journals, and who were boycotted by medical authors, has folded. They are, according to this story, getting out of the arms exhibition business. And so… Read More
Mr Wilkins wrote: Damn, you are right. The term “maltery” should have given it away. I blame the drugs I was on at the time. Mr Wilkins wrote: Damn! You’re right. May one inquire as to what drugs you were on today?
Teaching. I was on a debilitating drug named teaching… Didn’t you read the warning on the packet? Teaching can damage your health.