Couple new philosophy entries in SEP 10 Sep 2007 The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is an online, but highly regarded, source of review articles on philosophical topics, edited by Ed Zalta. Three new articles have popped up lately that have attracted my attention: The first is on Metaphysics, by Peter van Inwagen. Metaphysics is a hard discipline to define, by van Inwagen does a good job of presenting it for first time philosophers. The second is Causal Processes by my colleague Phil Dowe. Dowe is a leading light in the topic of causation, which itself is a topic of metaphysics, and he has proposed a “conserved quantity” account of casual process. The third is on Aristotle’s Categories, by Paul Studtmann. It is not easy to read Aristotle, because either technical terminology is used that derives from the late medieval and early modern logicians, or English words are used that sort of match the vernacular Greek terms Aristotle used (such as the “what it is to be”, which gets translated as “essence” in the Latin tradition). But Studtmann does a fair job of making him comprehensible. Aristotle’s book The Categories (also known as The Topics) is an attempt to classify all concepts in terms of ten apparently disconnected basic concepts, sometimes called “summum genera” in Latin. It is the foundation of all subsequent logic, and latterly, semantics. I know it because it is what the supposed essentialist story of species (another Latin term translating a Greek word eidos) is based on. [Buy the book 🙂 ] Logic and philosophy
Epistemology Reduction and surprisal, or, why water is wet 8 Aug 201122 Jun 2018 In his classic work A System of Logic, which set up so many of the issues and problems of the modern field of the philosophy of science, John Stuart Mill wrote: Not a trace of the properties of hydrogen or of oxygen is observable in those of their compound, water…. Read More
Logic and philosophy A quote from Lewis Carroll 11 Jun 202411 Jun 2024 Well, it’s actually from Charles Dodgson’s The Game of Logic 1887: The world contains many Things (such as “Buns”, “Babies”, “Beetles”, “Battledores”, &c.) ; and the Things possess many Attributes (such as “baked”, “beautiful”, “black”, “broken”, &c: in fact, whatever can be “attributed to”, that is “said to belong to”,… Read More
Logic and philosophy Physicists on science 25 Nov 2007 I have a rule (Wilkins’ Law #35, I think) that if any scientist is going to draw unwarranted metaphysical conclusions, it will be a physicist, and in particular a cosmologist. Witness Paul Davies in the New York Times. Davies wants to argue something like this: Read More
Mr Wilkins wrote: Damn, you are right. The term “maltery” should have given it away. I blame the drugs I was on at the time. Mr Wilkins wrote: Damn! You’re right. May one inquire as to what drugs you were on today?
Teaching. I was on a debilitating drug named teaching… Didn’t you read the warning on the packet? Teaching can damage your health.