<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Evolving Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://evolvingthoughts.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://evolvingthoughts.net</link>
	<description>Struggling with impermanence and vagueness in a complex world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 03:11:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is the dismal science even possible?</title>
		<link>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/02/is-the-dismal-science-even-possible/</link>
		<comments>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/02/is-the-dismal-science-even-possible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 03:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John S. Wilkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvingthoughts.net/?p=6019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A thought occurred to me. Given that money is an abstraction of an abstraction (value) of an abstraction (resources and labor) of things, and so has no standing in any ontology of society, is economics even possible as a science? &#8230; <a href="http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/02/is-the-dismal-science-even-possible/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/02/is-the-dismal-science-even-possible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plantinga&#8217;s EAAN</title>
		<link>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/plantingas-eaan/</link>
		<comments>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/plantingas-eaan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John S. Wilkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic and philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvingthoughts.net/?p=6015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A post now up at the Philosopher&#8217;s Carnival discusses Alvin Plantinga&#8217;s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (EAAN), and comment how it is like (not exactly the same) as a global skepticism argument being self-defeating. Plantinga&#8217;s argument goes like this: P1. If &#8230; <a href="http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/plantingas-eaan/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/plantingas-eaan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dark days</title>
		<link>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/dark-days/</link>
		<comments>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/dark-days/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John S. Wilkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sermon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvingthoughts.net/?p=6009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you didn’t notice, just recently a number of web giants, as well as innumerable other websites, went “dark” in protest against the attempts to control the internet by the US government. But the US isn’t the first nation &#8230; <a href="http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/dark-days/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/dark-days/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A philosophical apology from 1919 for not being pro-war</title>
		<link>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/a-philosophical-apology-from-1919-for-not-being-pro-war/</link>
		<comments>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/a-philosophical-apology-from-1919-for-not-being-pro-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 04:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John S. Wilkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic and philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sermon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truisms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvingthoughts.net/?p=6004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leiter posted the PDF of this on his site. I can&#8217;t help but reproduce some of the choicer quotes: &#8220;DEAR FRIEND: Your letter gently but un-mistakably intimates that I am a slacker, a slacker in peace as well as in &#8230; <a href="http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/a-philosophical-apology-from-1919-for-not-being-pro-war/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/a-philosophical-apology-from-1919-for-not-being-pro-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A logical inference, or, on how to submit Carnival of Evolution posts</title>
		<link>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/a-logical-inference-or-on-how-to-submit-carnival-of-evolution-posts/</link>
		<comments>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/a-logical-inference-or-on-how-to-submit-carnival-of-evolution-posts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John S. Wilkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvingthoughts.net/?p=6001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I could put this into standard logical form, or even argument map it, but I&#8217;m too lazy. However, since I&#8217;ll be hosting one of these soon, I should post this the way Bjørn Østman sent it to me: Carnival of &#8230; <a href="http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/a-logical-inference-or-on-how-to-submit-carnival-of-evolution-posts/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/a-logical-inference-or-on-how-to-submit-carnival-of-evolution-posts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Shandyan dilemma</title>
		<link>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/the-shandyan-dilemma/</link>
		<comments>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/the-shandyan-dilemma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John S. Wilkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social evolution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvingthoughts.net/?p=5995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reginald Hill, author of the Dalziel and Pascoe detective series among many others, has died. This is a partial post I started some time back, so I thought I&#8217;d post it as is. In Recalled to Life, Reginald Hill has &#8230; <a href="http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/the-shandyan-dilemma/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/the-shandyan-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Notes on Novelty 8: Conclusion &#8211; Post evo-devo</title>
		<link>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/notes-on-novelty-8-conclusion-post-evo-devo/</link>
		<comments>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/notes-on-novelty-8-conclusion-post-evo-devo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 23:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John S. Wilkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic and philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Species and systematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truisms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvingthoughts.net/?p=5976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Notes on Novelty series: 1. Introduction 2. Historical considerations &#8211; before and after evolution 3: The meaning of evolutionary novelty 4: Examples &#8211; the beetle&#8217;s horns and the turtle&#8217;s shell 5: Evolutionary radiations and individuation 6: Levels of description 7: Surprise! 8: Conclusion – Post evo-devo &#8230; <a href="http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/notes-on-novelty-8-conclusion-post-evo-devo/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/notes-on-novelty-8-conclusion-post-evo-devo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Notes on novelty 7: Surprise!</title>
		<link>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/notes-on-novelty-7-surprise/</link>
		<comments>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/notes-on-novelty-7-surprise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 03:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John S. Wilkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic and philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvingthoughts.net/?p=5962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Notes on Novelty series: 1. Introduction 2. Historical considerations &#8211; before and after evolution 3: The meaning of evolutionary novelty 4: Examples &#8211; the beetle&#8217;s horns and the turtle&#8217;s shell 5: Evolutionary radiations and individuation 6: Levels of description 7: Surprise! 8: Conclusion – Post evo-devo &#8230; <a href="http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/notes-on-novelty-7-surprise/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/notes-on-novelty-7-surprise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Size matters</title>
		<link>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/size-matters/</link>
		<comments>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/size-matters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 09:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John S. Wilkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvingthoughts.net/?p=5956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As always, click on the image to go see the entire Tony Piro goodness]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/size-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sherlock Cumberbatch on Evolutionary Psychology</title>
		<link>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/sherlock-cummerbatch-on-evolutionary-psychology/</link>
		<comments>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/sherlock-cummerbatch-on-evolutionary-psychology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 07:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John S. Wilkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvingthoughts.net/?p=5953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As always, click on the image to go see the entire Jonathon Rosenberg goodness]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/01/sherlock-cummerbatch-on-evolutionary-psychology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

