Click to go to the original and make rude comments about the misuse of “begs the question”.
Late note: The bastard fixed it. Find something else to complain about…
Click to go to the original and make rude comments about the misuse of “begs the question”.
Late note: The bastard fixed it. Find something else to complain about…
Filed under History, Metaphysics, Philosophy
Melbourne-based, U Sydney and U Melb affiliated historian and philosopher of science, especially biology. Apple tragic. Pratchett fan. Curmudgeon. Punster. Fatso.
This is my living room, so don't piss on the floor. I reserve the right to block users and delete any comments that are uncivil, spam or offensive to all. I have a broad tolerance, but don't test it, please.
Try to remain coherent, polite and put forward positive arguments if engaged in debate. There are plenty of places you can accuse people of being pedophilic communist sexist pigs; don't do it here.
Subscribe in a reader (RSS, Atom, etc.)

Is the question raised any different than the usual problem of the validity of reward and punishment in a setting without free will?
Social Responsibility refers to value –oriented decisions and behaviour of management of a business towards the society. The business owes responsibility towards the segment of the society such as shareholders, employees, consumers, suppliers, creditors, competitors, dealers, Government and the Community. A fair share of return must be made to these segments by the management. So as to strike an equitable and proper balance between the interests of the people who are affected by the activities of the business or who are the cause for the legitimate existence of the company.