From Zack Weiner’s Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal. Click the red button too.
New rules for science journalism
Filed under Humor, Journalism
Filed under Humor, Journalism
Melbourne-based, Sydney affiliated historian and philosopher of science, especially biology. Apple tragic. Pratchett fan. Curmudgeon. Punster. Fatso.
Subscribe in a reader (RSS, Atom, etc.)
This is my living room, so don't piss on the floor. I reserve the right to block users and delete any comments that are uncivil, spam or offensive to all. I have a broad tolerance, but don't test it, please.
Try to remain coherent, polite and put forward positive arguments if engaged in debate. There are plenty of places you can accuse people of being pedophilic communist sexist pigs; don't do it here.


It’s depressing because it’s true…
You don’t click the button. You just have to hover your mouse over it.
This rule can be usefully combined with Hinchliffe’s rule (“If the title is a question, the answer is ‘no’”).
Can I broke the rule ? Here a commercial magazine/paper writes more and more antivaccine, antiGMO articles. Editor hates science (though they have heavily scientific looka like links as refree ). Its journalist’s science level is quite low (for ex statistical bad errs).
I’d like to write “hoax” headline:
“Is dihydrogen monoxide in vaccines dangerous ?” etc.
It would be “Medicine-Sokal-article”, if I don’t tell truth in last line “It is called water”. (But I have not decided my strategy yet).